Evangelist Patricia Asiedua Asiamah, popularly known as Nana Agradaa, together with her husband Angel Asiamah, has moved to the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) of the Ghana Police Service, filing a formal complaint against a blogger and a woman they accuse of spreading false and harmful claims online.
Their lawyers, Agyaa Asamani Law Consult, confirmed in a statement dated May 5, 2026, that a petition has been submitted requesting a full criminal investigation into those behind the publication and circulation of what they describe as defamatory content.
The legal team is asking the CID to establish the facts surrounding a viral video that has been widely shared across platforms, including TikTok, and to determine the roles played by all parties involved.
Claims made in the viral video
At the centre of the complaint is a video featuring a woman who made a series of allegations that were later widely circulated on social media, including on a TikTok account identified as Katizowao.fv.
In the footage, she claimed that while Nana Agradaa was serving a prison sentence from July 2025 to March 2026, Angel Asiamah allegedly became involved in a romantic relationship with her.
She further alleged that Asiamah misrepresented his marital status, impregnated her, and subsequently abandoned both her and the child.
Public retraction and apology
The petition states that those claims did not stand after further developments.
According to the lawyers, the woman later appeared in another video alongside her brother, where she withdrew her earlier statements and apologised to both Nana Agradaa and Angel Asiamah.
During that retraction, she admitted that Angel Asiamah is not the father of her child and added that she had been influenced into making the initial accusations.
Role of the blogger questioned
Beyond the original allegations, the legal team has also raised concerns about the conduct of the blogger linked to the video’s spread.
They argue that the blogger did more than share content, insisting that he actively conducted the interview, repeatedly republished similar claims, and used the material to drive online traffic while allegedly harming the couple’s reputation.
Alleged impact on the couple
The petition further contends that the circulation of the claims has resulted in significant reputational harm, emotional strain, and public embarrassment for both Nana Agradaa and her husband.
It also warns that the statements, as published, had the potential to disturb public order and create unnecessary fear and anxiety among the public and followers.
Requests made to the CID
The couple is therefore urging the CID to take several steps, including:
- Launching a formal criminal investigation into both the woman and the blogger
- Summoning them under caution for interrogation and recording their statements
- Collecting and preserving all relevant digital evidence, including original uploads, reposts, comments, and any devices or files used in spreading the content
- Prosecuting both individuals if sufficient evidence is found to support criminal charges
- Treating the woman’s retraction as an admission that the claims were false, rather than a defence, and using it as supporting evidence that she knew the statements were untrue
